Speaker
Description
The neutron-rich cadmium isotopes, with two protons below the Z = 50 shell closure, constitute a unique laboratory for investigating the interplay between single-particle structure and collective excitations in the vicinity of the doubly magic $^{132}$Sn [1,2]. The evolution of nuclear structure in this region is governed by the gradual filling of neutron orbitals between the N = 50 and N = 82 shell closures, and cadmium isotopes have long served as textbook examples in discussions of vibrational collectivity [3,4]. However, as the neutron number increases towards N = 82, the persistence of vibrational behavior is challenged by the growing importance of pairing effects and seniority-driven structures near closed shells [4,5]. Spectroscopic information on $^{122}$Cd (N = 74), lying eight neutrons below the N = 82 shell closure, is therefore directly relevant to understanding the structural transition from a collective to a more seniority-dominated regime. Such data also provide useful benchmarks for shell-model calculations in this mass region [6,7].
In this work, the excited-state structure of $^{122}$Cd was investigated through beta-delayed gamma spectroscopy following the decay of $^{122}$Ag. The experiment was performed at the IGISOL facility of the University of Jyväskylä Accelerator Laboratory, Finland [8,9]. Isobarically pure beams were obtained by mass separation and Penning-trap purification with JYFLTRAP [9], and the collected activity was implanted at a dedicated decay station. The detection setup comprised three clover HPGe detectors, two coaxial HPGe detectors, and a plastic beta scintillator, operated in saturation mode with no tape movement during the counting cycle, allowing continuous accumulation of activity.
An extended decay scheme for the $^{122}$Ag → $^{122}$Cd decay was constructed on the basis of gamma-ray energies, relative intensities, and gamma-gamma coincidence relations. Spin-parity assignments are proposed for selected excited states populated in the beta decay, based on the observed coincidence topology and intensity-balance considerations. The resulting feeding pattern is discussed in terms of the dominant excitation mechanism, vibrational versus seniority-type, and confronted with available shell-model calculations for neutron-rich cadmium nuclei [6,7]. The new spectroscopic data provide important constraints on the effective interactions used in large-scale shell-model calculations near $^{132}$Sn [2,6].
[1] Y. X. Luo, J. O. Rasmussen, A. Gelberg et al., “New high-spin level schemes and excitation modes of 117,118,119,120,122Cd,” Nucl. Phys. A 784 (2007) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.11.001
[2] K. L. Jones, A. S. Adekola, D. W. Bardayan et al., “The magic nature of 132Sn explored through the single-particle states of 133Sn,” Nature 465 (2010) 454–457. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09048
[3] J. C. Batchelder, J. L. Wood, P. E. Garrett et al., “Low-lying collective states in 120Cd populated by β decay of 120Ag: Breakdown of the anharmonic vibrator model at the three-phonon level,” Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 054318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.054318
[4] P. E. Garrett, K. L. Green, J. L. Wood, “Breakdown of vibrational motion in the isotopes 110–116Cd,” Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 044307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044307
[5] T. Kautzsch, W. B. Walters, M. Hannawald et al., “Evidence for collective behavior in the neutron-rich isotopes 126,128,130Cd,” Eur. Phys. J. A 9 (2000) 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100500070038
[6] L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, “Similarity of nuclear structure in the 132Sn and 208Pb regions: proton-neutron multiplets,” Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 021305(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.021305
[7] B. Maheshwari, H. Abu Kassim, N. Yusof, A. K. Jain, “Parallel tale of seniority isomers in 130Cd and 206Hg: Testing the robustness of magic numbers,” Nucl. Phys. A 992 (2019) 121619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121619
[8] I. D. Moore, T. Eronen, D. Gorelov et al., “Towards commissioning the new IGISOL-4 facility,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 317 (2013) 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.06.036
[9] T. Eronen, V. S. Kolhinen, V.-V. Elomaa et al., “JYFLTRAP: a Penning trap for precision mass spectroscopy and isobaric purification,” Eur. Phys. J. A 48 (2012) 46. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12046-1