30 August 2026 to 6 September 2026
Europe/Warsaw timezone
Preliminary Timetable Now Available!

Quasielastic Barrier Distributions in 24Mg + 92,94,95Mo: Probing Dissipative Effects

2 Sept 2026, 12:45
15m
Oral presentation Parallel Session 1 (Hall A)

Speaker

Dr Kavita Rani (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland)

Description

Quasielastic (QE) scattering in the vicinity of the Coulomb barrier serves as a highly sensitive probe of reaction dynamics in heavy-ion collisions. Within the coupled-channels (CC) framework, the interplay between relative motion and intrinsic nuclear excitations leads to a distribution of effective barriers, commonly referred to as barrier distributions. These distributions encode valuable information about nuclear structure and reaction mechanisms and can typically be extracted from QE measurements [1,2]. However, observed deviations from standard CC predictions suggest that additional weakly coupled channels such as nucleon transfer and non-collective excitations may play a significant role in shaping the measured barrier structure [2].

Experimental studies have shown that QE barrier distributions $D_{qe}$ for several systems are smoother than predicted by standard CC calculations [3,4,5,6,7]. This behavior has been observed in reactions involving $^{20}$Ne with $^{92}$Zr [3], $^{61}$Ni [4], and $^{94,95}$Mo [6], and $^{24}$Mg with $^{92}$Zr [5]. It is interpreted as a consequence of dissipative dynamics arising from coupling to a large number of weak non-collective states. Although individually weak, these couplings collectively redistribute kinetic energy into intrinsic degrees of freedom, resulting in a damping of the barrier distribution structure. To describe such effects, the coupled-channels approach extended with random matrix theory (CCRMT) has been developed, incorporating statistical couplings to single-particle excitations [8]. These results have motivated further investigations of this dissipation mechanism using different strongly deformed projectiles and target systems with varying single-particle level densities.

In this context, quasielastic scattering measurements for the $^{24}$Mg + $^{92,94,95}$Mo systems were performed at the China Institute of Atomic Energy (CIAE), Beijing. The experiment was carried out at the HI-13 tandem accelerator, which delivered a $^{24}$Mg beam with an average current of approximately 50 enA over an energy range of 71–93 MeV in 1 MeV increments. Enriched self-supporting targets of $^{92}$Mo (99.93%), $^{94}$Mo (98.97%), and $^{95}$Mo (95.40%), each with a thickness of about 100 $\mu$g/cm$^{2}$, were employed. QE events were recorded using an array of silicon detectors arranged in five concentric rings spanning backward angles of 139$^\circ$ to 170$^\circ$, supplemented by forward-angle detectors positioned at 30$^\circ$. This geometry ensured extensive angular coverage, enabling reliable extraction of quasielastic barrier distributions. An increase in single-particle level density from $^{92}$Mo to $^{95}$Mo is anticipated to strengthen dissipative effects, resulting in a progressive smoothing of the barrier distributions [6]. The analysis of the collected data is currently in progress and preliminary results will be presented during the conference.

REFERENCES
[1] M. Dasgupta et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 401 (1998).
[2] H. Timmers et al., Nucl. Phys. A 584, 190 (1995).
[3] E. Piasecki et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 054613 (2009).
[4] A. Trzcińska et al., Phys. Rev. C 92, 034619 (2015).
[5] A. Trzcińska et al., Phys. Rev. C 102, 034617 (2020).
[6] G. Colucci et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 17, 3-A23 (2023).
[7] E. Piasecki et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 014616 (2019).
[8] S. Yusa et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 024606 (2010).

Author

Dr Kavita Rani (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland)

Co-authors

A. Trzcińska (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) C.J. Lin (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) Prof. E. Piasecki (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) G. Colucci (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) H. M. Jia (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) H.Q. Zhang (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) L. Yang (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) M. Wolińska-Cichocka (Heavy Ion Laboratory, University Of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) N. R. Ma (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) P.W. Wen (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China) Y. Cheng (China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.